Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Post #7: March 10, 2009: Labels in the Christian World

This week, I read an article of Newsweek by Lisa Miller called “A Christian by Any Other Name.” This article discusses how many denominations have sprung up and how the word “Christian” has fallen into narrower niches and groups. As people in the Christian world struggle to find their identity, many other people have gotten use to the label “follower of Jesus” and are gaining much popularity from the youth. Here are some advantages that boosters say in the Newsweek article:

“Follower of Jesus” has at least two advantages over “Christian” or
“evangelical.” First, it doesn’t carry baggage. You can wear it abroad, in
Islamic countries, or at home with your Jewish or Buddhist friends, without
causing offense. Second, it distances the bearer from the culture wars that have
made American politics so defensive.” http://www.newsweek.com/id/188198


After reading the article, I wonder how the word “Christian” in our society and culture has changed. I also am curious about the many other advantages and disadvantages of being a “follower of Jesus.” The first reason I thought the label “follower of Jesus” was brought up was because others thought they were to act and follow Jesus in the way we served the poor and loved each other. In other cases, we self-apply the label based on creeds and list of beliefs, not based on our behavior. Creeds, doctrines and prayers are very important in our religion, but I believe those are not primary ways of showing the world we are followers of Jesus.

There are many flaws with this label. Sometimes you may be a “follower” of Jesus, but if you do not believe in important beliefs such as Jesus rose from the dead or that we were saved because of Jesus’ sacrifice, then you are not a Christian. This makes me wonder the possible reasons why people chose to differentiate between “Christian” and “followers of Jesus.” One reason I thought was because the word “Christian” has gotten such a bad reputation because of “pretenders,” so real followers are avoiding the word in favor of something that means the same but with a different reputation.

Since the name “Christian” was introduced to the world a long time ago, its meaning and title has gone through many multiple transitions. Starting from religious persecution, to a religious faith as a formal way of expression through theology, to a time of reformation making a designation between “Christian” and “Catholic,” the word “Christian” has gone through many alterations, including many denominations and cults. But the word “Christian” has been viewed within society differently at many different times. At some point, the label Christian might have been given to those who show characteristics that are taught and exemplified by Jesus, ultimately meaning that person was “good.” Other examples would be the “word” Christian viewed as a political stance or relief work such as humanitarianism.

When interviewed about how the world is communicating Christianity with a judgemental attitude and about the concern about message and method, Dave Gibbons said this:
When I relate globally I usually say I’m a Christ follower rather than a
Christian. There are elements within our cultural Christianity that is not at
the heart of who Jesus is. As you travel, you begin to understand that the
problem isn’t Jesus as much as it is the things we’ve added to Jesus and the
gospel.


The spelling of the name is identical, but the meanings place us in different stances and positions. It is because of these differences that the name “Christian” keeps on changing and also why different denominations and cults form. You could ask 100 people about what the word “Christian” means and you will get many different views and opinions. Labels make it seem like one denomination or label is better than the other. What is your opinion on this? Would “follower of Jesus” suit you better than the label “Christian?” What is your definition of the word “Christian.”

4 comments:

  1. The word "Christian" has become heavily sugarcoated and often doesn't associate the person using the term with belief in Jesus's humanity and divinity. The culture of Christianity in America lacks the devotion of Christian societies in other parts of the world.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read about that too. The word "Christian" can definitely have many different meanings, depending on religion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The only real definition that can be given for the word "Christian" is that this is a person who believes that Jesus, the Christ, opened up a path of salvation for the world through His Death and Resurrection and that we are called to participate both in this eternal sacrifice and in the bringing about of God's Kingdom. That's it. No dogmas, doctrines, creeds, or other pronouncements of belief can limit the meaning of "Christian", though they can certainly define what is orthodox and what is heterodox; every single Christological council had dissidents and break-away sects such as the Coptic and Ethiopian Churches (still extant), the Nestorians (largely extinguished by the Mongol invasions, eventually becoming the Chaldean Catholic Church), or the Arians (who apparently all died off during the perpetual warfare of the Dark Ages).
    "Christian" can not refer to a political view (as various Christian societies have experimented with every conceivable political arrangement imaginable), nor can in refer to a particular moral code alone (as this would suck a vast number of non-Christians into the fold). Of course, a number of churches and groups have claimed to be the exclusive "Christian" organizaiton. Yet the only real meaning of a Christian is one who believes in Christ.
    That being said, "follower of Jesus" seems to be a kind of weak restatement of "Christian", since "Christian" is just Greek for "a folower of the Christ (Jesus)" anyway. "Follower of Jesus", unlike "Christian", doesn't have that sense of committment, that sense of "Jesus is the center of my religion (as opposed to just a philosopher)" to it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. By the way, Dillon, American Christianity can hardly be said to be more or less devotional than that of other societies. America is the land of revivals, social justice movements, Catholic Worker, etc., and contributes vast amounts of time and money to various Christian charitable causes. American Christianity is quite vibrant and, unlike most of the rest of the Christian world, is actively involved in the functioning of the whole society. Yes, perhaps the Third World has more churches and shrines and things like that, but the cruelty and greed of the elites, the crushing sexism, and the occasional genocide sort of remove any cause for boasting. And this is coming from a Central American, just so you know; I've seen both sides of this issue.

    ReplyDelete

Shingo Yamada's Confidant